Saturday, November 7, 2015

Uncles Sam’s Here To Stay

For more than seventy years or so, America has cemented its claim to the seat of hegemony. The Second World War made sure of that, even offering its land as the primary seat of the United Nations. Merriam-Webster would define hegemony as “the social, cultural, ideological, or economic influence exerted by a dominant group”. It is a term used by social scientists to describe leadership within a system of competing states. Hegemonic influence surpasses one international aspect, such that power ranges from international security to economic embargoes. The Soviet Union was the most recognized, if not the only, rival of the United States during the bitter years of the Cold War, and although war never occurred during these times, the most pressing issue was between the rivalry these two had and their desire to expand their respective ideologies: communism for the Soviet, and democracy for the United States. The Soviet Union never produced more than about half of America’s total national output, establishing the idea that economy is an important factor in statecraft and, ultimately, in transcending state to hegemonic level. The Soviet Union had the power to dismantle America, but it did not have the power to dismantle it.
            When the Cold War ended during the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the United States of America solidified its hegemonic status. It stood above the rest of the world, becoming a sort of “unipolar ruler” of the world. However, it took only less than ten years to shake America’s roots as a new form of threat emerged in the international scene in the form of “terrorism” as displayed in its moment of glory in the September 11 attack. Not just that, but China also took part of the stage in shaking America’s pedestal as it grew in economy and influence in the world market. It was in this time that the start of America’s declining hegemony was supposed to take place. However, international news tend to sensationalize, rendering their view unparalleled to long-term effectiveness. News focus more on the short-term failures of the United States such as its expensive budgetary allocations in its war against Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as China’s growing power. The media did not realize, however, that America hold’s power over a great number of states, forged allies in the brink of war during those lengthy seventy years, rendering the States a powerful hold towards much of the geopolitical structure of the world.

            Furthermore, states would look up to a state that would uphold international law and structure itself towards established international norms. There’s even a persistent joke that other states should be able to elect in America’s presidential elections because they also have a stake at its outcomes for the reason that America acts as a global police in the international scene. Majority of the twenty-first century’s legitimate use of force (especially in warfare) is deeply monopolized by the United States of America. As a proof of this, it manifests on majority of the world’s governments adopting the same policies concerning the use of force and international etiquettes on their own. And the trend still keeps on going and hegemony isn’t killed overnight as much as it has been built up from the get-go. Perspectives must be viewed on the long-term and it is true though that America will eventually lose its hegemonic pedestal but right now, Uncle Sam’s here to stay!

Wednesday, November 4, 2015

Separatism in the Philippines: The Conflict in Mindanao

Separatism in the Philippines: The Conflict in Mindanao
By: Charmaine C. Villacorta

            Throughout the decades, separatism has always been an enduring issue in the Philippines specifically in Mindanao. This separatist movement in Mindanao continues to struggle for self-determination much more in this day and age. Geography, religion, centralized form of government, and inequitable development among the regions are the some of the factors considered as reasons that contribute to the formation of the movement (Brillantes et al, n.di). Nonetheless, are these factors adequate for a separatist movement to occur? Or is there a deeper cause for its struggle for self-rule?

            Tracing back in history, major socio-political changes in Mindanao happened with the helped of an Arab missionary, Shariff Kabunsuan, who introduced Islam to the natives of the area which led to the formation of Islamic communities and sultanates in the region (Asian Institute of Journalism and Communication, 2011). Mindanao has never been conquered by the Spaniards, Americans, and Japanese who colonized the rest of the Philippines. During his administration, President Ramon Magsaysay opened Mindanao to Christian settlers which led to a more diversified region. Even then, the Christians and Muslims lived in peace which did not last long as fraudulent politicians and businessmen took advantage of the low economic state in Mindanao.

            The Mindanaoans suffered a lot of social injustices and land grabbing. They were rubbed of their homes which made them rise to protest and revolt against the Philippine government. It then escalated quickly into an armed conflict between the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and the Philippine Armed Forces (PAF) which led to the deaths of many. Because of the number of casualties, there was a need for the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) to intervene in 1976 which led to the signing of the Tripoli Agreement between the Philippine government and the MNLF. This triggered the division of MNLF. The Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) was formed subsequently (ARMM, n.d).
            In the present, peace talks between the parties involved are ongoing. It is to negotiate on terms and the legal framework to be used to achieve autonomy. The Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL) was also introduced. The BBL would establish a new political entity, the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region (BAR), replacing the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM). This bill is currently under deliberation in the Philippine Congress.

            The separatist movement in the Philippines slowly emerged in the beginning of the colonization period in the country – the reign of Spain. Spain made efforts to conquer and introduce Christianity in Mindanao however these efforts failed due to the resistance of the natives. Because of this, it would also be interesting to know a separatist movement in Spain which would be juxtaposed to the separatist movement in the Philippines.

             Euskadi Ta Azkatasuna (ETA), which means Basque Homeland and Liberty, is a separatist group in Spain that struggles for self determination and self-rule through terrorism ( The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica, 2014). ETA emerged from the Basque Nationalist Party as a resistance opposed to the repressive military dictatorship of General Francisco Franco. They have suffered many social injustices (BBC, 2011). Under Franco’s regime, he banned the Basque language. He also imprisoned the Basque scholars and tortured them for their political views and cultural beliefs. When Franco died, the transition their freedom started. Throughout the years, series of peace talks between the government of Spain and ETA took place to resolve the enduring predicament. Today, the Basque Country of Spain enjoys autonomy. ETA declared cessation of its terrorism activities however most of its insistent supporters vowed to continue to struggle for the full independence of the Basque state.

             The separatist organizations from Spain and the Philippines have the same objective. They struggle for their independence from both countries. They continue to fight for self determination and self-rule. With the ongoing deliberation of BBL in the Congress, this could be a chance for the Philippines to finally be united and be at peace.

Bibliography

The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. (2014, July 20). ETA. Retrieved 2015, from Britannica: http://www.britannica.com/topic/ETA
ARMM. (n.d). ARMM History. Retrieved 2015, from ARMM: http://www.armm.gov.ph/history/
Asian Institute of Journalism and Communication. (2011). History of ARMM. Retrieved October 2015, from Muslim Mindanao: http://www.muslimmindanao.ph/armm.html
BBC. (2011). Europe. Retrieved from BBC: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-11183574
Brillantes et al. (n.di). Decentralization and Federalism in the Philippines: Lessons from Global Community. Retrieved October 25, 2015, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/EROPA/UNPAN032065.pdf